Day in day out I hear/read/watch Republicans saying that the Affordable Care Act (ACA/Obamacare/Pelosicare etc) must be repealed. They never give a good reason, or any reason for that matter, why it should be so and it seems to come down to a prejudice against people who need help in life.
Meanwhile, Democrats and Republicans alike are being attacked on both sides for being pro-choice or pro-abortion. The argument is that a foetus is a life ergo it must be persevered for to kill it is murder. However, what no one seems to realise is that people are alive too and the ramifications of the appeal of the ACA is that many more people will die, many suffering for a long time unable to access help or relief.
Here there seems to be an obvious disparity between what is considered life and what is considered life. Immanuel Kant said that we have no obligation towards the welfare of animals except how they mirror our own lives and our own selves- if a child kills a worm then he may grow up to commit mass genocide. Obviously Kant’s theory is deeply problematic, if not completely wrong, as it excludes the nature of humans (such as mental health problems) and creates a rather a questionable notion of causality yet one thing seems to be true, how we treat others reflects who we are (do unto others and so forth).
Life is something that is taken for granted by most, as is health both physical and mental. I was speaking to a lady from China and I was telling her of the atrocities that China has done to people (such as minorities such as the Uyghurs, a Turkic ethnic group living in Eastern and Central Asia) and animals and are still doing. Whilst she conceded my rather heavy handed approach she rather interestingly said that she understood what I was saying but was scared to know too much for if she knew too much then she would not be happy once back in China. Another lady I spoke to on the matter was blunter ‘I don’t care, it does not affect me’. To both I pointed out how it does affect them for it is through knowledge that one grows and that we have to care about what happens to people, stand up for those oppressed and so forth.
More often than not people decide their political allegiances and then go along with whatever their party thinks, most mindlessly going hammer and tong on a policy they may not even agree with, as, amusingly shown in one of Aaron Sorkin’s brilliant TV shows, Studio 60 on the Sunset Strip
[Stuck on the roof with Danny, Jordan can’t understand why he’s so upset about Harriet’s premature “funny voice” promo.]
Jordan: It’s not the end of the world!
Danny: No, it’s not. But it’s a continuation of the one-sheet world.
Jordan: What’s a one-sheet world?
Danny: You know, a movie poster, a one-sheet. “I think we’ll do the Green Lantern — I can see the one-sheet now. Don’t worry that we don’t have a story — we’re gonna make all our money before word-of-mouth can kill us, anyway.” We elect Presidents the same way. “He’s got a big name, he’ll raise money, he’ll get the nomination! We’ll teach him how to be President later!”
Yeah, ‘cos that could never end badly…
‘till next time!